Analysis of the case of today’s statement in 2011, brief content, topic, what law committed, ten articles after January 21, urgent, really urgent

Analysis of the case of today’s statement in 2011, brief content, topic, what law committed, ten articles after January 21, urgent, really urgent

4 thoughts on “Analysis of the case of today’s statement in 2011, brief content, topic, what law committed, ten articles after January 21, urgent, really urgent”

  1. It is understood that Tan and Li, who live in Baisha County, are friends. Two years ago, Li had a conflict with the Internet cafe staff in a local town in the local town. In the conflict, Li was beaten. Later, Li told Tan the “bullies”, hoping that Tan would help him “out of breath”.

    knows that his friend was bullied. He found Wu to discuss it. At 11 o’clock that night, he brought the ax prepared and wooden sticks and rushed into the Internet cafe at 11 o’clock that night. The display was smashed in a meal, and the customers in the Internet cafe fled.

    The appraisal of the price certification center afterwards: The computer parts that were smashed on the same day were the total value of RMB 11,346.

    Shortly after the incident, Tan began to abscond. On January 28, 2011, he was captured by the local public security organs.

    In response to this case, the Baisha County People’s Court believes that the defendant Tan and others deliberately destroyed the property of others with a large amount. The crime of intentional damage to the property is clear, the evidence is indeed sufficient, the crime is established, and it is adopted.

    It is also understood that in the process of trial, Tan reached a mediation agreement with the Internet cafe operator, saying that he was willing to perform compensation obligations in accordance with the relevant content on the agreement to obtain the plaintiff of the plaintiff with civil lawsuits. understanding.

    The court believes that in view of Tan, as the defendant, he can compensate all the economic losses of the victims, and voluntarily confess his guilt, and obtain the understanding of the victims.

    In the end, the Baisha County People’s Court made a formal judgment on June 7, 2011: the defendant Tan was convicted of intentional damage to the property and sentenced to 8 months in prison.

Leave a Comment