What are the explicit regulations of the group owners of this group of groups?

On September 7, the State Cyber ​​Information Office issued the "Regulations on the Management of Internet Group Information Service" (referred to as "Regulations"), which involved the responsibility of the group owner. "Who is responsible for managing", "group friends make mistakes, punish the group owner", which caused heated discussion among netizens. In addition, some people question the nature of group services and whether the state has the right to supervise it. How should I understand the specific content of the "Regulations"? What responsibility should the group owner shoulder?

The groups of groups are not private spaces need to be reasonably supervised
Is to be clear whether group space countries have the power to supervise. Some people believe that "group" is a private space, a place for the private communication between the group owners and their members. The platforms of public power or the platform providing group services have no right to supervise. This idea is actually not established.

C communication secrets and communication freedom protection are information sharing activities that have nothing to do with action and at least with illegal activities, mostly limited to one -on -one communication. And except that the parties "you know I know", there will be no spillover effect, will not affect the third party, and will not affect the society. The group service is not only information sharing activities, but also closely related to behavior. Such as using groups to implement offline behavior, complete social mobilization or personnel aggregation, and even implement criminal activities. Therefore, the supervision of group services cannot be simply infringed with the freedom of communication and the secret of communication.

At the same time, even if it is pure information exchange, because there are many group members and the complicated components are complicated, it does not mean that any information published in the space is legal. Therefore, when the platform and users are likely to spread illegal information, relevant state organs can supervise group services after receiving the report.
The punishment only stops the group service without involving the "Law Office"
"Regulations" after the release of the "Provisions", some people associate the "Regulations" with some problems with the "Law Office". This is actually a misunderstanding of the legal effect level of the Regulations.

This group regulations are standardized documents released by the National Internet Information Office. After the constitution, law, administrative regulations, etc. In order, the responsibility obligations of group service providers and group owners (founders, managers) can only be limited to the extent of stopping related group services. It is impossible to violate the law, such as the criminal law who violates the criminal law to deprive personal freedom or property.
, the "Regulations" did not take effect on October 8th. The owners who were previously punished by criminal or other administrative punishments were caused by the owner's own illegal illegal, which has nothing to do with the "Regulations".
The group owners punished by public security organs and people's courts were mostly related to the behavior of the owner's violations of other laws and regulations. For example, the owner itself spreads harmful information, conducts illegal operations through WeChat groups, etc. This is not the same as the owner's responsibility mentioned in the "Regulations". Even without this "Regulations", the above -mentioned related behavior is illegal.
The owners are not always responsible for the main responsibility of attention

people use group services, mostly to solve normal legitimate needs. However, it is not uncommon to use group services to publish violence, obscene and other illegal content, damage the reputation of others, and spread the privacy of others. It is clear that group services and group services are not outside the law. Those who use group services should have the concept of boundary. They should have the consciousness that must not spread illegal and harmful information. Essence
reminding the majority of the group owners must lead by example.

After entering the group, can the owner kick out of the group in the environment without foul?